One of the significant changes to the Enterprise Zone program instituted by AB 1550 last year was the ability for a zone to expand its borders non contiguously. HCD has now issued guidelines to zones explaining how to apply for such an expansion. While this new provision allows greater flexibility for the zones, it also creates an opportunity for local controversy. For example, the HCD memo explains, “The second criterion states that the jurisdictions must also demonstrate that the excluded areas between the proposed new boundaries would not, based on the enterprise zone’s EDS, also benefit from the expansion.” This seems to leave just enough subjectivity to ensure that someone will be unhappy at some point.
Categories
- Budget Crisis (169)
- CAEZ (34)
- California Budget 2011 (146)
- Criticism (47)
- Federal Tax Credits (3)
- FTB (61)
- HCD (95)
- HIRE Act (1)
- It's Not Easy (32)
- JEDE Hearings 2009 (24)
- Jobs (2)
- LAMBRA (1)
- Legislation (196)
- Litigation (25)
- Local News (195)
- Not Enough (42)
- Policy Matters (79)
- The 2008 Race for 8 (37)
- The 2009 4 New Zones (28)
- The 2010 2 New Zones (8)
- The 23 New EZs (29)
- Uncategorized (142)
- WOTC (35)
Bills
Links
Zones (links)
- Agua Mansa (Expired)
- Antelope Valley
- Arvin
- Bakersfield (Expired)
- Barstow
- Calexico
- Coachella Valley
- Compton
- Delano
- Eureka
- Fresno
- Fresno County
- Hesperia
- Imperial Valley
- Kings County
- Lindsay
- Long Beach
- Los Angeles
- Madera
- Merced
- Oakland
- Oroville
- Pasadena
- Pittsburg
- Porterville (Expired)
- Richmond
- Sacramento
- Salinas Valley
- San Bernardino Valley
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Joaquin County
- San Jose
- Santa Ana
- Santa Clarita
- Shafter
- Shasta Metro
- Siskiyou County
- South Gate – Lynwood
- Stanislaus County
- Taft
- Tulare County
- Watsonville
- West Sacramento
- Yuba-Sutter
